Skip to main content

Netanyahu's partition of Jerusalem

While Israeli conservatives sanctify a united Jerusalem, many of them also support walling off some Palestinian neighborhoods that were annexed in 1967.
A Palestinian man walks past a newly erected temporary concrete wall that measures around 10 meters in length, in the East Jerusalem neighbourhood of Jabel Mukaber October 19, 2015. REUTERS/Ammar Awad   - RTS52AL

The "knife intifada" ratcheted up a few notches Oct. 18 and metamorphosed. Until now, the incidents were characterized as "lone wolf" attacks in which the perpetrator targets bystanders and attempts to harm as many people as he can before he is neutralized or killed. But a turnabout occurred Oct. 18 involving real firearms and an Israeli Bedouin terrorist, and the accidental lynching of an illegal Eritrean worker who was mistaken for another terrorist.

Security cameras that filmed the chaotic scene in the Beersheba central bus station captured the terror, panic and pandemonium caused by an isolated terrorist armed with a handgun. At 7:30 p.m., the terrorist burst into one of the bus platforms, shot and killed a Golani Brigade soldier and snatched his gun. He succeeded in wounding several more civilians and soldiers until he was killed by police.

After a short time, it emerged that the terrorist was not Palestinian, nor even an East Jerusalemite. He is, instead, an Israeli citizen, with all its implications; a Bedouin-Israeli from the town of Hura in the Negev. This intifada surprises us each day anew; sometimes it seems to surprise itself, too. No one has control; it's guided by raging impulses and exposed nerves.

But the main hub of the intifada and the epicenter of the violence was and remains Jerusalem. On Oct. 18, the police started construction of a concrete separation wall, 2½ meters (8.2 feet) tall, between the Jewish Armon Hanatziv neighborhood and the Palestinian neighborhood of Jabel Mukaber. The wall was erected after Palestinian rioters turned the Jewish neighborhood into a target for Molotov cocktails and stones. The wall was supposed to disconnect Jabel Mukaber, considered the most violent of the Palestinian neighborhoods and the one that spawned a large percentage of the terrorists, from the Jewish sections of the city. But the move also has symbolic significance. The trademark of the Israeli right, principally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is a “united” Jerusalem.

Netanyahu was first elected to the premiership in 1996, using the slogan, “[President Shimon] Peres will split Jerusalem.” Now he erects a wall in the heart of the city, dissects Jerusalem and separates Palestinian areas in the east from Jewish areas in the west with various obstructions such as police barriers, cement blocks and fences. Netanyahu is partitioning Jerusalem.

In the security-diplomatic Cabinet meeting held Oct. 18, Netanyahu encountered furious reactions from the right-wing ministers. Minister Yisrael Katz (a member of Netanyahu’s own Likud) reportedly said that the placement of the wall is akin to giving “a prize for terror.” Other ministers such as Naftali Bennett and Zeev Elkin argued that it creates the impression of dividing Jerusalem. Netanyahu, who has a very tender place in his heart for Jerusalem, subsequently decided to freeze the wall idea and instead “investigate alternative solutions.” All this, after the Cabinet had several weeks ago authorized concrete steps toward the physical division of Jerusalem at the request of the municipality, which had difficulty coping with the wave of violence and terror that swept the city.

In a Maariv poll taken over the weekend, it emerged that 69% of the Israeli public supports the return of Palestinian neighborhoods and villages that had been appended to Jerusalem after the 1967 Six-Day War back to the West Bank territories. This constitutes a tremendous majority of the Jewish population for de facto partition of the city. This is not a rare left-wing spasm, but the contrary: The present wave of terror greatly strengthens the desire of most Israelis to separate from the Palestinians. In that same poll, an amazing portion (58%) supported the transfer doctrine that had been espoused by Rehavam (Gandhi) Ze’evi, an Israeli tourism minister who was murdered by Islamic Jihad assassins in a Jerusalem hotel in October 2001, in the course of the second intifada.

The story of Jerusalem testifies to the complexity of the situation. After the resounding Israeli victory in the Six-Day War, Israel Defense Forces officers and government officials studied the map of Jerusalem and redesigned it. Until then, the city had been divided between Israel and Jordan. The Israeli side amounted to 38 square kilometers (15 square miles) and the Jordanian side around a fifth of that area, all told. The euphoria after the victory served to increase the Israeli appetite for more.

All the Arab neighborhoods and villages in the area were added to the united Jerusalem, increasing it to 126 square kilometers (the municipal area to this very day). Twenty-eight neighborhoods and villages that had never before been included in Jerusalem’s municipal territory were now added to what became “Greater Jerusalem,” the eternal Israeli capital, never to be divided again, Netanyahu promised. Today, Israel is learning the hard way that it had bit off more than it could chew.

Approximately 300,000 Palestinians live in these regions that were annexed to Jerusalem, and these people are viewed as partial Israeli citizens. They carry Israeli identity cards and are entitled to vote for the municipal council and the mayor, but not in the Knesset elections. They are not full Israeli citizens, but they enjoy full freedom of movement; they sport Israeli license plates on their cars and enjoy full Israeli social welfare benefits. The East Jerusalem Palestinian is a rather strange, hybrid creature: an Israeli citizen in some respects but not really a citizen at all. The maintenance of all these neighborhoods and villages costs the Israeli Treasury around 3 billion shekels a year (about $778 million). The recent terror wave greatly enhanced the collective Israeli desire to get rid of as many Arab citizens as possible.

Politician Haim Ramon carries the banner for those who feel that there is an urgent need to shrink Jerusalem’s municipal borders. Ramon, former deputy prime minister under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, is a veteran politician who resigned from political life several years ago, but has been planning his comeback ever since. He told Al-Monitor, “The appending of the neighborhoods and villages in 1967 was a terrible historic mistake, but it’s not too late. We can fix it with a simple leadership decision.” His idea is to change the status of those same neighborhoods and villages from Area C, under full Israeli security and civilian rule, to Area B, under civil control of the Palestinian Authority but under Israel’s security control. This step would reduce the number of Palestinian residents of Jerusalem from today’s 300,000 to somewhere in the range of 50,000-60,000 Palestinians who live in the inner Palestinian neighborhoods that cannot be severed from the city. “Jerusalem’s security won’t be harmed,” Ramon emphasized, “because the IDF and the security apparatus will continue to have freedom of action in those neighborhoods. No one will transform them into Islamic State strongholds or launch rockets from them. But it is possible to separate most of the Palestinian population from Jewish Jerusalem and save around 2 billion shekels a year.”

Ramon’s statements enjoy widespread public support, but there is no one on the political map with the courage to raise the banner. Jerusalem remains sacred. Even opposition leaders Isaac Herzog from the Zionist Camp and Yair Lapid from Yesh Atid treat Jerusalem with great respect and give Netanyahu’s government sweeping support in the fight against the wave of violence. Neither so much as mentions the elephant in the crowded living room: the fact that East Jerusalem is a no-man’s-land lacking real sovereignty. The city has long been divided, but those on the Israeli side are only now beginning to understand that fact. There is an urgent need to face reality and reduce the deadly friction between the two nations.

Join hundreds of Middle East professionals with Al-Monitor PRO.

Business and policy professionals use PRO to monitor the regional economy and improve their reports, memos and presentations. Try it for free and cancel anytime.

Already a Member? Sign in

Free

The Middle East's Best Newsletters

Join over 50,000 readers who access our journalists dedicated newsletters, covering the top political, security, business and tech issues across the region each week.
Delivered straight to your inbox.

Free

What's included:
Our Expertise

Free newsletters available:

  • The Takeaway & Week in Review
  • Middle East Minute (AM)
  • Daily Briefing (PM)
  • Business & Tech Briefing
  • Security Briefing
  • Gulf Briefing
  • Israel Briefing
  • Palestine Briefing
  • Turkey Briefing
  • Iraq Briefing
Expert

Premium Membership

Join the Middle East's most notable experts for premium memos, trend reports, live video Q&A, and intimate in-person events, each detailing exclusive insights on business and geopolitical trends shaping the region.

$25.00 / month
billed annually

Become Member Start with 1-week free trial
What's included:
Our Expertise AI-driven

Memos - premium analytical writing: actionable insights on markets and geopolitics.

Live Video Q&A - Hear from our top journalists and regional experts.

Special Events - Intimate in-person events with business & political VIPs.

Trend Reports - Deep dive analysis on market updates.

All premium Industry Newsletters - Monitor the Middle East's most important industries. Prioritize your target industries for weekly review:

  • Capital Markets & Private Equity
  • Venture Capital & Startups
  • Green Energy
  • Supply Chain
  • Sustainable Development
  • Leading Edge Technology
  • Oil & Gas
  • Real Estate & Construction
  • Banking

We also offer team plans. Please send an email to pro.support@al-monitor.com and we'll onboard your team.

Already a Member? Sign in

Palestine Briefing Palestine Briefing

Palestine Briefing

Top Palestine stories in your inbox each week

Trend Reports

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (4th R) attends a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (3rd L) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on February 22, 2019. (Photo by HOW HWEE YOUNG / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read HOW HWEE YOUNG/AFP via Getty Images)
Premium

From roads to routers: The future of China-Middle East connectivity

A general view shows the solar plant in Uyayna, north of Riyadh, on March 29, 2018. - On March 27, Saudi announced a deal with Japan's SoftBank to build the world's biggest solar plant. (Photo by FAYEZ NURELDINE / AFP) (Photo credit should read FAYEZ NURELDINE/AFP via Getty Images)
Premium

Regulations on Middle East renewable energy industry starting to take shape

Start your PRO membership today.

Join the Middle East's top business and policy professionals to access exclusive PRO insights today.

Join Al-Monitor PRO Start with 1-week free trial