Rocket attacks that left one British and two American service members dead in Iraq March 11 were likely the work of an Iranian-backed Shiite proxy group, the top US military commander in the Middle East told Congress today.
Why it matters: Wednesday’s attack, which utilized Soviet-era rocket artillery to attack Camp Taji, where coalition troops are based just 17 miles (27 kilometers) north of Baghdad, bore the hallmarks of Iran-backed Khataib Hezbollah, US Central Command chief Gen. Kenneth McKenzie said.
While the United States has been able to deter direct Iranian strikes against US forces after the Jan. 8 ballistic missile attack on the Ain al-Asad airbase in Iraq, McKenzie conceded that Iranian proxy groups are still attacking with the goal of expelling American troops.
Back-and-forth: The Pentagon launched attacks against Khataib Hezbollah’s weapons caches after American contractor Nawres Hamed was killed in a similar rocket strike on Dec. 27.
The revelation that Iran-backed groups have not been deterred sparked attacks from Democrats and independents who insisted that the Donald Trump administration’s "maximum pressure" policy has failed. "They're still doing it, and they're also headed toward a nuclear weapon," said Sen. Angus King, I-Me., in a tense back-and-forth with McKenzie.
Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon today, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said at least a dozen rockets from Iranian-backed groups had impacted Camp Taji, causing “some structural damage” and wounding 14 coalition service members and contractors in addition to the dead.
What’s next: McKenzie will address lawmakers in closed session later today. The CENTCOM chief said earlier this week that the United States is set to deploy Patriot air defense systems to Iraq to cope with the upgraded threat from Iran-backed groups.
Former Trump administration officials said the attack was likely carried out with the knowledge and support of Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
“The US military is likely preparing options for a response to present” Trump, a former senior administration official told Al-Monitor. “These responses would likely range from direct attacks against the militia that carried this out in Iraq, targeting IRGC operatives in Iraq or Syria up to and including direct attacks on Iranian military in Iran. They may also be considered covert actions to respond, which could help reduce the chances of escalation.”
Many in the Trump administration believed that the ballistic missile strikes that left more than 100 US service members with mild traumatic brain injuries after the killing of Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani in an American drone strike in January would only be the start of the Iranian response, the former official said, despite Trump’s insistence that Iran appeared to be standing down after the Jan. 8 attacks.
Know more: Read Pentagon correspondent Jack Detsch on Wednesday’s attack that killed three coalition service members in Iraq.