Pentagon: Rebel forces taking heavy casualties in Raqqa fight

Article Summary
The United States confirmed today that the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces are taking heavy casualties in an effort to push the Islamic State out of its stronghold in Raqqa.

US-backed Syrian rebels are suffering heavy casualties as they attempt to retake the Islamic State (IS) stronghold of Raqqa from fighters lodged in tunnels, trenches and other defensive positions, the Pentagon said today.

Despite stiff resistance from improvised explosive devices, car bombs and even drones, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have now entered the Old City of Raqqa, breaking through a seventh-century wall laden with explosives where IS has been holding out. The contingent of Arab and Kurdish soldiers number between 30,000 and 40,000.

Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis said casualty numbers are “absolutely” rising in the ongoing battle, now in its sixth week. The Defense Department did not provide any figures behind the loss assessment.

Despite continued losses, Davis said that the Syrian effort to dislodge IS would be sustainable over the long haul. This effort is set to receive an infusion of weapons, vehicles and tactical military gear in the Senate’s new defense spending bill.

“We knew that Raqqa was going to be very hard,” Davis said. “It’s a stop-and-go effort by its very nature.”

Nearly two dozen airstrikes launched by the US-led coalition in Syria have helped the SDF offset sniper fire and IEDs to take nearly a square mile of ground, including a high-rise complex, in a three-pronged advance over the weekend.

Anti-IS troops are advancing from three separate areas, including two pushes along the Euphrates River and in another northern drive toward the Old City. The London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights estimates that the US-led coalition has liberated about 35% of the city.

Davis said US troops stationed nearby haven’t had any recent problems with pro-regime forces thanks to the de-escalation hotline with the Russians. American troops are primarily stationed in Syria in an active advisory capacity, as the SDF pushes forward into the Old City, which is IS' primary enclave in Raqqa.

But Davis said today that US troops in the region can “often find themselves in a situation where they’re going to have to be on the defensive” and respond with force to IS attacks.

The uptick in airstrikes and SDF casualties comes with news over the weekend that IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who was previously reported dead, may still be alive. On Sunday, Lahur Talabany, a leading Kurdish intelligence official in Iraq, told Reuters he believes the leader of the self-proclaimed caliphate was still alive in Raqqa.

But Pentagon officials, who have so far refused to confirm reporting on Baghdadi’s status, believe he is no longer a major figure when it comes to the fight in Iraq and Syria.

“Militarily speaking,” Davis told reporters today, “he’s largely irrelevant.”

Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:

  • The award-winning Middle East Lobbying - The Influence Game
  • Archived articles
  • Exclusive events
  • The Week in Review
  • Lobbying newsletter delivered weekly
Found in: syrian war, abu bakr al-baghdadi, islamic state, pentagon, us military, syrian democratic forces, sdf, raqqa

Jack Detsch is Al-Monitor’s Pentagon correspondent. Based in Washington, Detsch examines US-Middle East relations through the lens of the Defense Department. Detsch previously covered cybersecurity for Passcode, the Christian Science Monitor’s project on security and privacy in the Digital Age. Detsch also served as editorial assistant at The Diplomat Magazine and worked for NPR-affiliated stations in San Francisco. On Twitter: @JackDetsch_ALM, Email:

Next for you

The website uses cookies and similar technologies to track browsing behavior for adapting the website to the user, for delivering our services, for market research, and for advertising. Detailed information, including the right to withdraw consent, can be found in our Privacy Policy. To view our Privacy Policy in full, click here. By using our site, you agree to these terms.