Skip to main content

Soccer politics reaches fever pitch in Iran

Despite promises to promote the privatization of soccer, Iranian authorities retain a firm grip over the sport in the country.
EDITORS' NOTE: Reuters and other foreign media are subject to Iranian restrictions on leaving the office to report, film or take pictures in Tehran.

Hossein Badamaki (R) of Iran's Persepolis, Mishal Al Saeed (C) and Saud Khariri of Saudi Arabia's Al-Ittihad fight for the ball during their AFC Champions League soccer match at Tehran's Azadi stadium May 3, 2011. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi (IRAN - Tags: SPORT SOCCER) - GM1E75400KD01

The international governing body of soccer, FIFA, does not grant any individual or legal entity the right to control more than one member club at the same time. However, this rule has often been ignored in Iran, where two of the capital’s most prominent soccer clubs, Esteghlal and Persepolis, are owned by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports. This ownership has caused many challenges and tensions over the years. The latest incident involves the public criticism that has followed the sports ministry’s decision to cover the two clubs’ hefty debts last month. The question being asked is why are public funds being used for this purpose? And why are these clubs not transferred to the private sector?

The 85th Tehran derby between Esteghlal and Persepolis was held Oct. 26. The match drew close to 85,000 fans to Tehran’s Azadi stadium, a venue that is also owned by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports but rented out to the two clubs. However, this derby was different in terms of how tickets for it were sold.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.