Skip to main content

Intel: How Trump laid legal groundwork to strike Iran after Iraqi militia attacks

U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper speaks about airstrikes by the U.S. military in Iraq and Syria, at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., December 29, 2019. With him are U.S. Army General Mark Milley and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. REUTERS/Tom Brenner - RC2C5E9P88JE
US Defense Secretary Mark Esper speaks about airstrikes by the US military in Iraq and Syria, at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, US, Dec. 29, 2019. With him are US Army Gen. Mark Milley and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. — REUTERS/Tom Brenner

Mounting tensions between US forces and Tehran-backed proxies in Iraq could lead to broader American military action against Iran. If that happens, President Donald Trump already has at his disposal a legal opinion the State Department submitted to Congress last June.

“We do not make a distinction between the Iranian regime and any of its proxies that they organize, train and equip,” a senior State Department official told reporters today. “We are not giving Iran the fiction of deniability any longer.”

The United States blamed the Iran-backed militia Kataib Hezbollah for deadly attacks on American forces in Iraq and struck the militia in Iraq and Syria Dec. 29. Abdul Mahdi al-Muhandis, a former Kataib Hezbollah commander and current head of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Units, has vowed “a very tough response” on US forces in Iraq.

Why it matters: Democrats in Congress are worried the Trump administration could use two prior military authorizations — one from 2001 and the other from 2002 — to use military force against Iran as tensions mount in Iraq.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish