Iran and world powers finally met last week in Vienna to continue the nuclear talks after a five-month delay due to the Iranian elections, which changed the administration in Tehran. The sixth round of talks, designed to bring the US back into the agreement and remove sanctions and bring Iran back into full compliance, did not go as well as some Western observers had hoped. However, an Iranian official speaking to Tasnim News Agency has denied many versions of the story appearing in Western media outlets.

The source, described as “a senior foreign ministry official,” said that “Iran’s text of recommendations were based on the drafts of the six previous rounds” of talks. The official said that the recommendations were based on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the formal name for the nuclear deal which was signed in 2015 and spells out the terms of the agreement. The official continued that none of the recommendations “were maximalist, but the opposing side is used to a minimum approach to their commitments.”

The official said that the three European countries involved in the talks — the UK, France and Germany, which are thought to be representing the US as well — were not prepared for Iran to present two drafts based on both the JCPOA and UN Resolution 2231, and that they needed to return to their capitals to consult with their superiors. Given the US exit from JCPOA in 2018 under then-President Donald Trump, the United States is not officially part of the current talks, though the three European countries are likely coordinating with the US given that it is the US sanctions that Iran wants removed.

The Iranian official said that the Western countries approached the talks with the expectation of “giving minimal concessions and receiving maximum concessions.” Regardless of the criticism of Western countries, he said, none have been able to find legal or technical faults given that they are based on the JCPOA.