Irak'ın Nabzı

XXX trumps IS as Iraqi lawmakers focus on eradicating Internet porn

By
p
Article Summary
A number of Iraqi parliamentarians recently signed a draft bill to block pornographic sites in the country, an effort some call a narrow approach to a complex issue.

NAJAF, Iraq — Abdul-Hadi al-Hakim, an Iraqi parliament member with the Citizen Coalition, announced July 28 that more than 150 parliament members' signatures had been collected to pass a bill calling on the authorities to block pornographic sites on the Internet. Hakim said that most of the National Iraqi Alliance parliamentarians have signed the draft law, while most representatives of the Sunni National Forces Union and the Kurdistan Alliance refrained from signing.

Hakim justified the bill by stating, “Most problems youths face today are caused by surfing porn sites.” He added that pornographic sites have led to a 200% increase in divorce rates and a 50% decrease in marriage and contributed to the rise of sexual crimes, including rape and sexual harassment.

However, Hakim’s statement is based on mere speculation and not on scientific studies. In the same statement, he also invoked numerous other social problems to justify the bill, including early marriage, high unemployment and poverty rates and violence against women. It is worth mentioning that in 2014, Iraq came in last on a list of statistics issued by Pornhub, the largest pornography website on the Internet, which ranked the average amount of time spent on the site by visitors according to country.

Blocking pornographic sites is ineffective, as circumvention techniques are widely available to the public. For instance, the same Pornhub statistics showed that visitors from Iran and Saudi Arabia spend more time on the site than Iraqis, even though these states' religious regimes ban pornographic websites. Visitors in Iran registered an average of 7 minutes and 46 seconds per visit, while those in Saudi Arabia registered 8 minutes 23 seconds.

The announcement of the bill stirred controversy in Iraq. Some Iraqis welcomed the proposal and created a Facebook page to support the bill, while others believe it is an attempt to impose religious laws on the country and a preliminary step to gradually bring religious rule to Iraq, especially considering the bill was submitted at the initiative of Islamist members of parliament and justified from religious perspectives.

According to civil activists, this bill is not a priority in the midst of the current deteriorating security and political situation in Iraq. TV presenter Ali Wajih posted on Facebook on July 28, “Did our problems in Iraq end, and the only remaining one is porn sites? Isn’t our tragic situation in Iraq much worse than pornographic movies?”

A number of Internet cafe owners in Najaf and Baghdad told Al-Monitor over the phone that some of their customers visit pornographic sites, but this is not a widespread phenomenon. Samir, the owner of an Internet cafe in the Baghdad al-Jadida neighborhood, told Al-Monitor that if Iraq’s parliament wants to censor the Internet, it had better block websites inciting religious violence, hatred and sectarianism in Iraq.

According to Samir, it makes no sense to call for blocking pornographic sites while there are hundreds of websites that broadcast scenes of decapitation and torture by members of the Islamic State and similar gangs or sites that incite such acts or stir hatred among the Iraqi people.

The Iraqi government had made a previous attempt on June 14, 2014, to block social networking sites Viber and WhatsApp for security purposes following IS’ takeover of Mosul. However, popular methods such as the use of proxy servers foiled those attempts, which only lasted a few days.

Even if the new bill is passed by the parliament, it is not expected to succeed, as the Iraqi authorities are not equipped with the technical means to implement the restrictions.

Internet censorship has been widely discussed and legislated by most countries of the world as various crimes and illegal activities proliferate in cyberspace. The censoring and restricting of pornographic websites by laws passed to protect children and families have become commonplace. Yet at the same time, observing privacy and individual freedoms must not be overlooked when enacting these laws.

In this context, those advocating blocking pornographic sites should examine the experiences of other countries. For example, the United Kingdom requires Internet service providers to offer filters to block pornographic websites.

The protection of public morality cannot be achieved by legislating censorship. Those advocating blocking pornographic sites would be better served to address this issue in terms offering tools to protect children, not blanket legislation.

Makaleyi okumaya devam etmek için Al-Monitor’a abone olun

  • Güncellenmiş ve ödüllü Lobicilik Yazı Dizisi
  • Arşivlenmiş makaleler
  • Özel etkinlikler
  • Geçtiğimiz Haftaya Bakış e-postanıza gelsin
  • Haftalık lobicilik bülteni
Bu bölümlerde bulundu: state censorship, religion and state, pornography, iraqi politics, internet restrictions, internet, censorship

Ali Mamouri, Al-Monitor’un İran’ın Nabzı bölümünün yazarlarındandır. Dini konular üzerine uzmanlaşmış bir araştırmacı yazar olan Mamouri, İran ve Irak’ta dini okullarda ve ayrıca İran üniversitelerinde eğitmenlik yapmıştır. Yazarın dini konularda ve Ortadoğu’da toplumsal dönüşüm ve mezhepçilik üzerine yazdığı bir dizi makale, her iki ülkede yayımlanmıştır.

x

The website uses cookies and similar technologies to track browsing behavior for adapting the website to the user, for delivering our services, for market research, and for advertising. Detailed information, including the right to withdraw consent, can be found in our Privacy Policy. To view our Privacy Policy in full, click here. By using our site, you agree to these terms.

Accept