Skip to main content

Why Iran’s currency repatriation rules threaten rising exports

Iranian exports have enjoyed a boost due to the weaker rial in recent months, but the country’s private sector says the mandatory currency repatriation mechanism devised by the central bank threatens legitimate exports.
A man counts Iranian rials at a currency exchange shop, before the start of the U.S. sanctions on Tehran, in Basra, Iraq November 3, 2018. Picture taken November 3, 2018. REUTERS/Essam al-Sudani - RC153985B7A0

When the administration of President Hassan Rouhani fixed the exchange rate of the Iranian rial against the US dollar back in April — an ultimately failed effort to curb the free fall of Iran’s national currency — it also revived a controversial mandatory currency repatriation policy. The initiative, which obligates exporters to bring home their hard currency revenues through designated channels, may yet prove perilous.

Private sector businesses are less than happy with a regulatory stance that forcefully tells them where to redirect their hard-earned money. But, at the same time, it is difficult to argue that export yields — a major source of hard currency revenues under extraordinary conditions defined by reimposed US sanctions — should flow outside the country. So top private sector representatives, namely those of the Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture (ICCIMA), have been vocal in their support for hard currency repatriation. They have also fiercely opposed — to no avail — what they perceive to be faulty mechanisms adopted by the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) that will end up hurting exports, and especially exports to Iran’s neighbors.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.