A group of 300 conservative figures in Iran wrote an open letter to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei asking for structural reforms for the country. The letter, which was published on various Telegram channels, was billed as an open letter from “officials of revolutionary organizations and student activists … about existing concerns regarding the state of the Islamic Republic and the need for fundamental reforms.” The letter is rare given that calls for reform addressed directly to the supreme leader typically do not come from the right but from Reformist figures or groups.

The letter stated that while these groups of activists have written about the state of the country regarding their concerns, they have never written to Khamenei directly. However, in accordance with their view, “day by day the government is resembling a lifeless body and breaking from within … and in consideration that the country needs structural and fundamental reforms … and no other official has the discretion,” they decided it was time to address Khamenei directly.

The letter addressed the problems with the institutions of the government, meaning the entire Islamic Republic and those institutions that operate under the supreme leader and not just the institutions under the Hassan Rouhani administration. The letter said that the problems with these institutions are neither small nor big, but that they essentially operate contrary to the purposes for which they exist.

The letter then criticized the different branches of government. Regarding the president’s powers, the letter said that they have been decreased and — given the situation of “engineered elections” (a criticism of the Guardian Council that vets candidates for the elections) and people having to choose between “bad and worse” during the elections — people do not see the administration as a part of them but rather standing against them. On Iran’s parliament, the letter said that parliamentarians are elected by spending vast amounts of money and lobbying and through conducting transactions with other government officials, and they are no longer “the people’s house” — as it is often referred to.