Israel Pulse

Can Hamas' Haniyeh accept Egyptian demands?

Article Summary
During their trip to Cairo, Hamas officials heard a long list of Egyptian security demands in exchange for mending ties, and now incoming leader Ismail Haniyeh must sell the deal or be left to rule the Gaza Strip without Egypt's help.

Senior Hamas official Ismail Haniyeh went home to the Gaza Strip after a 4½-month sojourn in Qatar. Haniyeh decided to return from Qatar even though the process of his appointment as Hamas leader had not yet been finalized. Hamas' supreme body, the Shura Council, had elected Haniyeh to replace current political bureau chief Khaled Meshaal.

Residents of the Shati refugee camp in Gaza welcomed Haniyeh with great excitement on Jan. 27, hoping to hear good news from him regarding Hamas-Egypt relations after the series of meetings he held with Egyptian intelligence heads in Cairo. However, Haniyeh kept mum. In the near future, he will have to make one of the most difficult decisions of his life: whether to accept the conditions dictated to him by Egypt for a significant easement of the blockade on the Gaza Strip, or remain entrenched in his position and continue to cope with the harsh situation there.

Almost no one in Hamas today thinks that the movement can continue to rule over more than 1.8 million residents in the Gaza Strip indefinitely without the end of the closure or at least a significant loosening. The head of Egypt’s general intelligence, Khaled Fawzy, knows this, and told Haniyeh loud and clear: You must hand over to us any wanted person we ask for, whether he was directly involved in terror attacks in the Sinai Peninsula or just assisted jihadi agents.

Other Hamas officials who participated in the Cairo talks included Mousa Abu Marzouk and Ruhi Mushtaq, who were stunned by the Egyptian ultimatum. Any such suspects extradited to Egypt could be sentenced to death. Handing over suspects to another state, whether they are Hamas operatives or belong to other organizations, is likely to be seen in the movement as unforgivable surrender and betrayal.

Also read

A security source in the Palestinian Authority who is familiar with the content of the Cairo talks told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity that the Hamas leaders asked to hold negotiations and reach a compromise, but the Egyptians would not budge.

After consulting with Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar, Haniyeh floated a proposal: Hamas would allow Egyptian intelligence agents to cross-examine suspects in the Gaza Strip, but not hand them over on demand. It is unclear from this proposal what would happen afterward if the cross-examination indicates involvement of the suspect in attacks against Egyptian soldiers. Would Hamas allow the extradition or demand that legal proceedings take place in Gaza? Either way, the Egyptians rejected the proposal outright. The chiefs of Egyptian intelligence told Haniyeh and his escorts: Either you agree to our demands and receive easements on the blockade and the opening up of a new page in our relations, or you’ll condemn the entire Hamas movement to death.

Haniyeh kept silent on the subject when he returned to the Gaza Strip. But in an interview with Egyptian news agency MENA, Zahar tried to downplay the controversy. “There is an improvement in relations with Egypt,” claimed Zahar, “but certain issues still remain unresolved, issues that need to be resolved.”

The heads of the Egyptian intelligence units gave Haniyeh an incentive to agree to their terms and to convince those in Gaza that the Egyptians are serious about their intentions. Fawzy promised, in the name of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, that Cairo will now implement a series of easements in the Rafah crossing. The crossing will remain open for longer hours and the quota of transit visas from Gaza to Egypt will be increased. The easements will continue for a few weeks in the hope that Haniyeh will return with a positive answer. If he fails to attain agreement to the Egyptian demand, Haniyeh will be forced to cope alone with the severe ramifications.

But aside from Egypt’s key demand from Hamas, several agreements were reached between the sides in Cairo. The Hamas delegation committed to increasing its patrols along the length of its border with Egypt to avert the infiltration of armed operatives into Egyptian territory. Hamas also agreed to allow Egyptian forces to pursue suspects and conduct searches within Gaza in the course of its operations.

Most surprising, the Egyptians demanded that the Hamas leadership maintain quiet on its Israeli border as well. As security deterioration or violent confrontation with Israel can shake up the entire region, Hamas leaders were requested to carry out a series of steps to prove that the movement is placing less emphasis on resistance activities and more on welfare activities to improve the lives of Gaza residents.

Egypt is using the carrot-and-stick approach. The more that Hamas proves it is shifting its focus toward alleviating the harsh conditions of the residents in the Gaza Strip and the more it accedes to Cairo’s security demands, the more the blockade will be eased and the Hamas regime will be strengthened.

Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:

  • The award-winning Middle East Lobbying - The Influence Game
  • Archived articles
  • Exclusive events
  • The Week in Review
  • Lobbying newsletter delivered weekly
Found in: jihadis, sinai peninsula, cairo, egypt-hamas relations, gaza strip, hamas, ismail haniyeh

Shlomi Eldar is a columnist for Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. For the past two decades, he has covered the Palestinian Authority and especially the Gaza Strip for Israel’s Channels 1 and 10, reporting on the emergence of Hamas. In 2007, he was awarded the Sokolov Prize, Israel’s most important media award, for this work.

Eldar has published two books: "Eyeless in Gaza" (2005), which anticipated the Hamas victory in the subsequent Palestinian elections, and "Getting to Know Hamas" (2012), which won the Yitzhak Sadeh Prize for Military Literature. He was awarded the Ophir Prize (Israeli Oscar) twice for his documentary films: "Precious Life" (2010) and "Foreign Land" (2018). "Precious Life" was also shortlisted for an Oscar and was broadcast on HBO. He has a master's degree in Middle East studies from the Hebrew University. On Twitter: @shlomieldar

Next for you

The website uses cookies and similar technologies to track browsing behavior for adapting the website to the user, for delivering our services, for market research, and for advertising. Detailed information, including the right to withdraw consent, can be found in our Privacy Policy. To view our Privacy Policy in full, click here. By using our site, you agree to these terms.