Skip to main content

Will Israel Warm Up To Moderate Islamists?

Mustafa Akyol argues that its recent apology to Turkey shows Israel can find a way toward peace with Islamists.
An Israeli flag flutters in the wind as a naval vessel (not seen) escorts the Mavi Marmara, a Gaza-bound ship that was raided by Israeli marines, to the Ashdod port May 31, 2010. Israeli marines stormed the Turkish aid ship bound for Gaza on Monday and 10 pro-Palestinian activists were killed, triggering a profound diplomatic crisis. REUTERS/Amir Cohen (ISRAEL - Tags: POLITICS CIVIL UNREST IMAGES OF THE DAY) - RTR2ELLI

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan on March 22 to offer an apology for the killing of nine civilian Turks on the Gaza Flotilla of 2010, he certainly took an unexpected step. Because many observers, both in Israel and Turkey, were long convinced that as long as these two leaders stayed in power, no reconciliation would ever come.

Personally speaking, I clearly observed the Israeli side of this skepticism among the dozens of Israeli statesmen, academics or journalists I have talked to in the past three years. Many of them looked convinced that Erdoğan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP) were too “Islamist” to be friendly or even pragmatic towards Israel. Even if Israel offered an apology for the deaths of Turkish civillians, a former Israeli diplomat once explained to me, he and his colleagues do not believe that Turkey would restore good relations with the Jewish state because of “the AKP ideology.” This ideology, he seemed to believe, necessitates that Israel, sooner or later, must the wiped out and the whole historical Palestine should be restored to Muslim rule.

The more I conversed with Israelis, in meetings in the West or Israel, the more I noticed the strength of this deep-seated suspicion towards  Islamism. Many seemed convinced that this is a much less flexible and adaptable ideology than Israel's older foes — such as Arab nationalism and "anti-colonial" communism — and thus the Jewish state had to stand firmly against it.

This categorical alarmism about Islamism is probably also the main reason why many Israelis see the Arab Revolutions — in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and hopefully Syria — in a more negative light than the proponents of democracy in the Middle East. These revolutions are replacing secular dictatorships with elected Islamists, and many Israelis, who might be sympathetic to democratization in principle, seem to prefer the old order masters out of distaste with the new winners.

However, if this is the Israeli vision for the Middle East, then Israel is in trouble. Because the regional tide towards democratization, which inevitably includes some dose of Islamization, seems irreversible. In Turkey, for example, the age of the ultrasecular generals and their quasi-military rule, is finished for good, and the AKP represents not a temporary anomaly but the new normal. Neither the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is likely to become an oppressed opposition group again, as it was during the decades of Nasser, Sadat, and Mubarak. We are at the dawn of a new moment in the Muslim Middle East, and it is the Islamists' moment more than anybody else.

In the face of this new reality, Israel can take two different paths. It can either long for the past and fear for the future, flexing its muscles and deepening its isolation. Or, it can try to engage with the new actors of the Middle East, starting with the more moderate ones.

I would certainly prefer to see the latter, and that is why I was happy with the reconciliation Israel initiated with Turkey via Netanyahu's apology to Erdoğan. Erdoğan's AKP is the most liberal, pragmatic, and relatively secular one among all Islamist parties in the Middle East — hence it even refuses the term "Islamist" and insists in calling itself "conservative." That is why the AKP can be a pivotal link that can establish more dialogue and ultimately moderation between Israel and other Islamists, including militant ones such as Hamas. (No wonder Hamas' recent shift from the Iranian axis to Qatari/Turkish one coincides with a relative moderation in the organization's rhetoric and action.)

Among Islamists, a milder attitude towards Israel would be pushed mainly by pragmatism — or the realization that Israel is a fact of life and it is safer to learn to live with it. Yet on the basis of doctrine as well, there are not as many obstacles as it is sometimes believed to exist. Arguably, the destruction of Israel is a cause driven by Palestinian nationalism rather than Islam, although the former force sometimes uses an Islamic language, as seen in the Hamas charter. From a purely Islamic point of view, the key issue in Israel/Palestine is the safety, dignity and liberty of the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Eastern Jerusalem, and these objectives can well be guaranteed in a fair two-state solution.

In short, an Israel that will opt for a two-state solution, and takes the necessary steps such as stopping new settlements and disestablishing older ones, can find a ground for peace with the Islamists as well — unless, of course, this argument is too naive, for Israel in fact uses the fear of the Islamists as a pretext to stay away from a two-state solution.

Mustafa Akyol is a contributing writer for Al-Monitor's Turkey Pulse, and a columnist for two Turkish newspapers, Hürriyet Daily News and Star. His articles have also appeared in Foreign AffairsNewsweekThe New York TimesThe Washington PostThe Wall Street Journal and The Guardian. He studied political science and history at the Boğaziçi University in Istanbul, where he still lives. His book, Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty, an argument for "Muslim liberalism," was published by W.W. Norton in July 2011.

Join hundreds of Middle East professionals with Al-Monitor PRO.

Business and policy professionals use PRO to monitor the regional economy and improve their reports, memos and presentations. Try it for free and cancel anytime.

Free

The Middle East's Best Newsletters

Join over 50,000 readers who access our journalists dedicated newsletters, covering the top political, security, business and tech issues across the region each week.
Delivered straight to your inbox.

Free

What's included:
Our Expertise

Free newsletters available:

  • The Takeaway & Week in Review
  • Middle East Minute (AM)
  • Daily Briefing (PM)
  • Business & Tech Briefing
  • Security Briefing
  • Gulf Briefing
  • Israel Briefing
  • Palestine Briefing
  • Turkey Briefing
  • Iraq Briefing
Expert

Premium Membership

Join the Middle East's most notable experts for premium memos, trend reports, live video Q&A, and intimate in-person events, each detailing exclusive insights on business and geopolitical trends shaping the region.

$25.00 / month
billed annually

Become Member Start with 1-week free trial

We also offer team plans. Please send an email to pro.support@al-monitor.com and we'll onboard your team.

What's included:
Our Expertise AI-driven

Memos - premium analytical writing: actionable insights on markets and geopolitics.

Live Video Q&A - Hear from our top journalists and regional experts.

Special Events - Intimate in-person events with business & political VIPs.

Trend Reports - Deep dive analysis on market updates.

All premium Industry Newsletters - Monitor the Middle East's most important industries. Prioritize your target industries for weekly review:

  • Capital Markets & Private Equity
  • Venture Capital & Startups
  • Green Energy
  • Supply Chain
  • Sustainable Development
  • Leading Edge Technology
  • Oil & Gas
  • Real Estate & Construction
  • Banking

Start your PRO membership today.

Join the Middle East's top business and policy professionals to access exclusive PRO insights today.

Join Al-Monitor PRO Start with 1-week free trial