Education Minister Naftali Bennett founded the New Right party on the eve of the last election. When the party failed to pass the voter threshold, he had a hard time dealing with the outcome. He was not satisfied with the many volunteers who recounted the ballots at questionable voting stations and actually joined them in an effort to prove that there were irregularities and that his party actually made it into the Knesset. When the numbers failed to confirm his suspicions, his party announced that the fight was not over and that the next stage would be an appeal to the courts, demanding a recount in several polling stations where the New Right felt that the outcome was illogical.
Just a few days later, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s lawyers announced that if Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit did not agree to postpone the hearings for the prime minister’s three cases, they would appeal the ruling before the Supreme Court. They argue that it makes no sense that people dealing with a single case receive three months to prepare their defense, whereas Netanyahu, who is facing three separate charges, received the same amount of time.
It seems to me that when the outgoing education minister and prime minister needed justice most, they were oblivious to how much damage they had done over time to the judicial authority, whose role was to listen to anyone who feels injured and to determine whether their claims are reasonable or just. They thought that the courts would always be there for them when they felt they had suffered some personal injury or were victims of discrimination. Netanyahu backed the attacks on the justice system throughout the last Knesset, and there is every indication that he plans to intensify his war against the court in his next term. Bennett had pressured Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked to both limit the authority of the Supreme Court and to appoint conservative and religious judges.
The main issue surrounding the next coalition revolves around who will be the next justice minister. Based on past comments, the two main candidates for the position, the Likud's Yariv Levin and Betzalel Smotrich of the United Right, are both thought to be more extreme than Shaked. Appointing either one of them would deal a devastating blow to Israeli democracy. Both men represent the simplistic approach that elected officials should decide and legislate, leaving it up to the justice system to ensure that the resulting structure operates in accordance with the legislators’ decisions and legislation.
AL-MONITOR All-Access gives you unlimited access to all our journalism, the full Daily Briefing, exclusive interviews, premium newsletters, and live events — for less than $2/week.