Skip to main content

Why Turkey is boosting its budget for dubious 'village guards'

The paramilitary force that Turkey formed to fight the Kurdistan Workers Party has been controversial since the 1980s, so why is the government expanding it now?

Siirt, TURKEY:  A village guard poses with his rifle in his cabin in the mountainous southeastern city of Siirt, Pervari province, 28 June 2005. The outlawed Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK) retaliated by blowing up a train in Bingol at the weekend, killing five people. The unrest marks sharply increased violence between the PKK and the army in the Turkish southeast since April, months after the rebels, 01 June 2004, called off a five-year unilateral ceasefire.         AFP PHOTO/MUSTAFA OZER  (Photo credit sh
A village guard sits with his rifle in his cabin in the mountainous southeastern city of Siirt, Pervari province, Turkey, June 28, 2005. — GETTY/Mustafa Ozer

DIYARBAKIR, Turkey — For travelers in southeast Turkey, it's common in rural areas to see men in uniform armed with AK-47 assault rifles. They take part in operations with security forces, guard government facilities and clash with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), but they are neither police nor soldiers. They're called “village guards.”

Some are full-time government employees; others are on short-term contracts. The village guard system is based on a law passed in 1924 that was updated and applied in 1985 when the PKK attacks started.

This paramilitary force was controversial from the outset. The PKK and its sympathizers accused the guards of treason, as most of them are Kurds, and accused the state of instigating bloodshed among Kurds. The state said the fact that a guard system was needed was proof that most Kurds were opposed to the PKK. The acrimonious debate never ceased. The PKK demanded that the system be abolished and that those involved be prosecuted. The village guards weren't particularly threatened by those demands; they were more worried about their future, asking what would happen to them once the Kurdish issue was solved.

Their opponents alleged that the guards were altering the social fabric of the region. A 2013 report by Surec Research Center titled “Provisional Village Guards and the Solution Process” said, “Although the village guard system was established as an element of the state’s security policy, those who joined the system used their guns for their personal interests. Because they had the backing of state security forces, they were able to impose themselves as the basic authority of their villages and the region.”

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish