Skip to main content

Deputy Speaker Makari: 'We Do Not See Stability in Lebanon'

Speaking to Al-Monitor's Elie Hajj, Lebanon's Deputy Speaker Farid Makari explains why he believes the European Union will likely implicate Hezbollah's military wing in the murders in Bulgaria, but not classify Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

Lebanese Christian leaders and members of the ruling majority stand during a minute of silence in memory of slain Lebanese army general Francois El Hajj, at the Kataeb party headquarters in Beirut 12 December 2007. Hajj and his bodyguard were killed today in a car bomb that also injured eight others in a Christian suburb on the outskirts of Beirut. L-R: National Liberal Party's Dory Chamoun, deputy parliament speaker Farid Makari, Lebanese Forces party leader Samir Geagea, former Lebanese president Amine Ge
Lebanese Christian leaders and members of the ruling majority stand during a minute of silence in memory of slain Lebanese army general Francois El Hajj, at the Kataeb party headquarters in Beirut Dec. 12, 2007. L-R: National Liberal Party's Dory Chamoun, deputy parliament speaker Farid Makari and Lebanese Forces party leader Samir Geagea. — ANWAR AMRO/AFP/Getty Images

Al-Monitor asked Lebanese Deputy Speaker Farid Makari his opinion regarding the impact of the accusations made by the Bulgarian authorities that Hezbollah is responsible for the bus bombing in Burgas. He responded, "There is a big difference between Hezbollah being placed on the list of terrorist organizations within the European Union — and thus at an international level later on — and it not being included on this list."

He continued, "In my personal opinion, at least based on policies we have observed up until now, European states will not classify [Hezbollah] as a terrorist organization."

He pointed to "the great efforts being made by France and Germany in particular to keep other European countries from condemning Hezbollah as a whole. Of course, those who are following the situation will notice a big difference between the attitudes of the northern and southern EU states in dealing with this issue. The majority of the northern states tend to take a more hardline position. Some might say that those states that participate in the United Nations Interim Force in South Lebanon (UNFIL) would prefer not to expose their military units to the risk of retaliation from Hezbollah. They know that the party is capable of moving its supporters in southern towns and villages to harass their soldiers, and thus they prefer to distance themselves from these confrontations and their consequences. In many ways, these soldiers could be transformed into what resemble hostages. I, however, believe that this possibility is not the greatest motivation behind the position of states that tend not to take a hardline stance toward Hezbollah on this issue."

Makari, who recently returned to Beirut following a visit to Paris, clarified that there is a conviction among influential political circles in the EU that putting pressure on the Lebanese government — financially, economically and politically — with regards to the claim that a terrorist group participates in this government, or rather this is their government, would inevitably lead to its downfall. In this case, Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati would not wait for someone to ask him to leave. This is despite the fact that he enjoys nerves of steel and an unmatched ability to withstand pressure. This issue goes beyond the ability to resist. As everyone knows, there is an economic crisis in Lebanon. Investments have stopped and production sectors — especially tourism and real estate — are nearly inoperative. Sanctions against the government would mean its inevitable downfall."

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish