It appears that Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit has successfully refuted rumors that before assuming his important job, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu performed surgery on him to remove his spine. Mandelblit, who also serves as the government’s legal adviser, stood up to the boss and declared that he would not be able to defend the proposed legislation legalizing wildcat West Bank settlements against a Supreme Court challenge. Coalition chairman David Bitan, Netanyahu’s yes-man, then announced that the government would retain private counsel to do the job. In fact, however, Mandelblit’s “dissent” plays a central role in Netanyahu’s strategic planning.

Netanyahu’s first move is to push the so-called regularization bill through the Knesset and steal the thunder of his coalition partner Naftali Bennett, chair of HaBayit HaYehudi. At that point, human rights and leftist groups will petition the nation’s top court in a challenge to the law. The court will rule that the law is unconstitutional, and the right wing will accuse the left and the court of betraying Zionism. Netanyahu will then hold up the Israeli legal system as a shining example of democracy and respect for the law. Most important, Israel will wriggle out of appearing in the defendant’s box at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague for building settlements on private Palestinian land.

This devious plan has not escaped the attention of human rights organizations or Israel’s opposition parties. In recent days, party leaders have been arguing whether to take on the ungrateful task that Netanyahu has in store for them of petitioning the Supreme Court against the law. Al-Monitor has learned that many among them want to call Netanyahu’s bluff and remove the fig leaf they have been providing him.

The late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, also not a great fan of human rights organizations or the Supreme Court, famously said that the Palestinian police had an easier time than Israel fighting Hamas because they were not hampered by B’Tselem, the human rights group, or the Supreme Court. Similarly, without petitions to the High Court by organizations like B’Tselem or directly from Palestinians whose land has been confiscated, the incumbent prime minister will find himself exposed, facing the ICJ. He will be forced to explain to the judges that expropriating land from a Palestinian under Israeli occupation so that a Jew can build his home there is a legal, just and humane act.