Skip to main content

Turkey Adjusts its Syria Policy

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan came to Washington to convince Washington the red line had been crossed in Syria, but he came up short.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) shake hands at the end of their joint news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, May 16, 2013.     REUTERS/Jason Reed    (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS) - RTXZPEK
President Barack Obama and Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) shake hands at the end of their joint news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House, May 16, 2013.
The main thing to come out the talks between Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and President Barack Obama in the White House on May 16, in relation to the Syrian crisis, is a recalibration of Ankara’s Syria policy by a US that previously engineered a reconciliation process between Turkey and Israel, and is working to do the same between Ankara and Baghdad.
 
Washington clearly needs a Turkey whose regional policies are in line with US expectations, and the result of Erdoğan’s visit indicates that Ankara was been left with no choice but to change tack on Syria if it hopes to be part of any  international action aimed ending the sectarian civil war.

Erdoğan had traveled to Washington hoping to convince Obama that the red line Washington set on the use of chemical weapons by the forces of President Bashar al-Assad had been crossed, implying some form of military response was necessary. He was also hoping to convince the US of the need to openly arm opposition forces and to see some movement on the question of a no-fly zone to protect civilians, as well as a safe haven in Syria to reduce the growing pressure on Turkey from refugees.

What happened instead is that Obama convinced Erdoğan to move away from the military line and support the political-diplomatic effort, now being spearheaded by Washington and Moscow, for a settlement to the conflict through talks involving the Syrian opposition and the regime. A meeting under UN auspices in Geneva in July 2012 had endorsed the idea of talks between the opposition and the regime, but Ankara never approached it with much enthusiasm.

Erdoğan himself is on record as saying recently that the effort to revive the Geneva process amounts to “spreading flour on a string,” a Turkish saying suggesting a waste of time. The fact that he is now openly supporting the proposed second Geneva summit, expected to be held in the coming weeks, represents a serious change in position.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish