Skip to main content

Syria’s constitutional committee still mired in discord

Disputes on decision-making rules and time frames continue to delay the committee’s inauguration a year and a half since Syrian parties agreed on a committee to draft a new constitution, even though discord over its composition has been overcome.
A picture taken on April 26, 2019 shows a general view of the hall where the Syrian constitutional committee takes place in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. - Two-day talks on Syria backed by Iran, Russia and Turkey concluded in Kazakhstan on April 26, 2019 without notable progress on forming a constitutional committee to drive a political settlement in the war-wracked country. (Photo by Alexey FILIPPOV / AFP)        (Photo credit should read ALEXEY FILIPPOV/AFP/Getty Images)
Read in 

The 13th round of talks in the Astana process, launched by Russia, Iran and Turkey to clear the way for the Geneva peace negotiations on the Syrian crisis, was muddled through last week amid lingering differences on a long-anticipated constitutional committee. Although the escalating clashes in rebel-held Idlib topped the agenda of the talks in Kazakhstan’s capital, now called Nur-Sultan, there was strong expectation that the constitutional committee would be finally announced. Ankara spoke of progress toward the formation of the body, as some sticking points between the Syrian government and Turkey, which acts as a spokesman for the opposition, remained unresolved, deferring the matter to the Sept. 11 summit of the Russian, Iranian and Turkish leaders. Disagreements over the composition of the committee were largely resolved, but the rules on how it will function continue to be the subject of discord. 

Ahead of the meeting, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu had stressed joint efforts toward “declaring the formation of the committee.” Ahmad Toma, who represents the armed opposition, had spoken of “positive developments,” saying that an announcement on the committee’s formation “will come soon.” Speaking July 31 in Istanbul, he blamed the delay on Damascus, saying, “The regime kept putting forward unacceptable conditions. It demanded the chairmanship and a two-thirds majority in the committee, but that was not accepted.”

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.