Turkish bans on Wikipedia and public drinking rouse anger

The Turkish public has reacted with anger to both the Antalya police department's ban on the public consumption of alcohol and a Turkish court's ban on Wikipedia.

al-monitor A man sells beer near Taksim Square in Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2014. Photo by OZAN KOSE/AFP/Getty Images.

Topics covered

freedom of the press, turkish court, internet, wikipedia, alcohol, turkish law

May 1, 2017

The Antalya police department issued on April 27 a ban on the consumption of alcohol in a "disturbing and open" manner in public and in parked cars. The public and those working in the tourism industry reacted so strongly to the ban that it was reworded, but that did not end the controversy. 

Tourism professionals see the ban in the coastal city of Turkey as negatively impacting an already floundering tourism industry, while social media users suggest the ban is aimed at imposing a conservative lifestyle. Stunned by the reaction, the police department removed the decree from its website and replaced it with an updated announcement that omitted the word “ban” and stated that public alcohol consumption was to be “regulated” by the Governorship of Antalya.

The police department asserted that alcohol consumption was not banned in public areas — only "regulated" to prevent the disturbance of the public order. Still, the public was not satisfied with this explanation. The police department and Governorship of Antalya could not provide adequate clarifications to ease the discontent. The debate continues unabated.

Osman Ayik, the board chairman of the Turkish Hoteliers Federation (TUROFED), told Al-Monitor: “We are asked about this ban both on domestic and international levels. The controversies sparked will have a negative impact on the tourism sector.” He added, “Due to the recent diplomatic crisis the with European Union and Russia, the tourism sector recorded significant losses in 2016. Turkey is perceived by the rest of the world as an oppressive and autocratic country. Relevant authorities should give positive messages both to the public and the rest of the world and change this perception. We inform those who ask that this is not a blanket ban on alcohol but is a practice to prevent people disturbing the public order.”

Hakan Duran, the board chairman of the Professional Hotel Managers Association (POYD), said: “Such controversies damage Turkey’s reputation and image in the eyes of the rest of the world. Our tourist potential could be affected by such controversies. We should be more careful on issues relating to our reputation and image.”

Who is causing disturbances to the public order? Is there some legal basis for the ban? Izzet Ozgenc, a professor of criminal law at Gazi University, told Al-Monitor, “Neither the police department nor the governorship can impose such bans legally. This ban is not feasible or practical.”

Another expert on criminal law, Sinan Kocaoglu, said, “The governorship and police department take actions as if they are the guardians of the public order, but they impose their own concepts of public order and a specific lifestyle to the society.” He added, “Making arbitrary rules to regulate general social life to prevent a few possible incidents is legally wrong. The governorship and police department are causing confusion, which is an indication of significant malfunction within the system of government in Turkey.”

An irate tour operator in Antalya who spoke not for attribution said: “This nonsensical rule was imposed by some illiterate, ignorant bureaucrats who are not aware of the environment they live in. The bulk of tourists coming to Antalya are Russians and Germans. Now imagine the Russians without their vodka and the Germans having to drink their beer secretly.”

Access to Wikipedia is blocked

A Turkish court issued a decision on April 29 to block access to Wikipedia. The Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) announced that access to Wikipedia was blocked over content that suggests Turkey cooperates with terrorist organizations like the Islamic State. The ICTA stated they are in touch with Wikipedia to remove the false content. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales said on April 29 via Twitter: “Access to information is a fundamental human right. Turkish people, I will always stand with you to fight for this right.” Many Turkish social media users said the Wikipedia ban is an irrefutable indication of the Turkish government's autocratic and oppressive mindset.

Republican People’s Party (CHP) deputy Erdal Aksunger told Al-Monitor: “Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, an information source. It cannot be argued that it is supported by terrorist organizations. If the government’s mindset and approach to the right to internet and information access is blocking it to restrict ‘undesirable’ contents, they should block all sites, including Google itself. Unfortunately, restrictions on basic human rights can be easily imposed here in Turkey.”

Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:
  • Al-Monitor Archives
  • The Week in Review
  • Exclusive Events
  • Invitation-only Briefings

Recommended Articles

Violent protests spread across Iran border province
Al-Monitor Staff | Human rights | Feb 25, 2021
Turkish police seize several tons of illegal alcohol
Al-Monitor Staff | Courts and the law | Feb 3, 2021
Iran blocks encrypted messaging app Signal
Al-Monitor Staff | Social Media | Jan 26, 2021
Top Turkish court rejects appeal for release of philanthropist Kavala
Diego Cupolo | Courts and the law | Dec 29, 2020
Europe human rights court calls on Turkey to release Demirtas
Diego Cupolo | Kurds | Dec 22, 2020