BAGHDAD, Iraq — Iraqi parliament Speaker Salim al-Jabouri suddenly announced July 17 the formation of a parliamentary committee tasked with amending the country's constitution. While this is not the first time that calls have been made to amend the Iraqi Constitution, no serious steps had been taken.
Although Article 142 of the constitution defines the mechanisms and methods for amending the constitution, differences have prevented the parliament's political blocs from doing so. They have not managed to reach the consensus required to hold a referendum on amendments to the constitution.
In 2006, the Iraqi parliament formed another committee tasked with amending the constitution. But this committee failed to reach a final agreement on the articles that need to be changed. In 2010, parliament chose not form a similar committee despite the fact that Article 142 of the constitution provides for the formation of a parliamentary committee to amend the constitution.
Surprisingly, Jabouri called upon the parliamentary blocs July 17 to field candidates for membership in the constitutional amendment committee amid a major political and popular split over several issues. Chief among these are reform, governmental change, the formation of regions, disputed areas, Federal (Supreme) Court matters, the provinces, oil and gas, the National Guard and the ongoing war with the Islamic State (IS).
The parliament's political blocs have different views regarding both the importance and timing of the formation of the committee and the articles that should be amended, especially considering that these blocs have come to know which articles and paragraphs have worked and which ones have not during the 11 years in which the constitution has been implemented. It should be noted that some articles still have not even been implemented yet. Chief among these is Article 140, which stipulates the normalization of the situation between Arabs, Kurds and Turkmens in disputed areas, such as the province of Kirkuk.
Raad al-Dahlaki, a parliamentarian for the National Forces Alliance and member of the Legal Committee, told Al-Monitor, "The task of drafting or amending the constitution is not the preserve of the political class alone, as this is an issue that involves society as well; hence the need for the constitutional amendment committee to include politicians, artists, athletes, actors and other segments of society so that the constitution could truly reflect the community."
He added, "Limiting the constitutional amendment process to political blocs will create the need to amend the constitution whenever a new parliament is elected."
Dahlaki said that the constitution needs amendment at the level of the "transitional articles, and the articles that define the identity of Iraq must be revised so that Iraq's Arab identity is ensured. Also, the powers of the prime minister should be reduced and divided between the president and the speaker of the parliament.”
Reform Front parliament member Muhammad Saihood said the attempts to amend the constitution have repeatedly failed due to the sectarian quotas that are behind all of the country's problems. Saihood told Al-Mada Press on July 20, "The Front is behind the idea to form a committee to amend the constitution. This time around, we will not let those seeking to take quotas obstruct our work and the amendments will pass because the front enjoys a majority in parliament."
National Alliance parliamentarian Salim Shawqi told Al-Monitor, "The formation of a committee to amend the constitution is stipulated by the constitution and the Iraqi parliament is obliged to form this committee."
"There are controversial articles such as Article 140, which is related to Kirkuk, and others related to the method of forming regions, the powers of the president, the sharing of financial resources, the sharing of power, the law of provinces, the issue of multiple citizenship and the personal status law."
The Kurdistan Alliance bloc opposes amending the constitution despite its desire for at least Article 140 to be amended. The article provides for the holding of referendum in Kirkuk to have it annexed to the Kurdistan region by the end of 2007; however, some believe this date needs to be changed as it is badly outdated.
Zana Roustaa, a parliamentarian with the Kurdistan Alliance bloc who was nominated for the membership of the Iraqi constitutional amendment committee, told the Rudaw network July 18, "Some Arab parliamentarians are proposing to amend the Iraqi Constitution, which provides for a good part of the rights of the Kurdish people."
He indicated that some believe the Kurds have too many rights "and are asking for the amendment of the constitution out of regret" of the rights' being granted. He said Kurds oppose any alteration of their rights, and as a result, "The Kurdish blocs do not want the constitution to be amended."
According to Article 142, a referendum on amended articles shall be successful if approved by the majority of voters nationally and if not rejected by two-thirds of the voters in three or more governorates. Otherwise, the amendments are deemed null and a new parliamentary committee is to be formed to discuss the articles in question. This means that even if 15 provinces approve the amendments, but two-thirds of the voters of the other three provinces reject the amendments (there are 18 Iraqi provinces), then the amendments fail to become the law of the land.
Also, the constitution stipulates that the amendments must be made with the consent of all the members of the parliamentary constitutional amendment committee. In other words, these conditions make the constitution amendment process a very difficult task. Add to this the deep differences over Kirkuk; the powers of the president, the prime minister and the speaker of the parliament; the provinces; dual citizenship; the personal status law; the transformation of the parliamentary system into a presidential one and the description and identification of the state. Even the preamble of the constitution is disputed.
This all requires from the parliamentary constitution amendment committee a great deal of time, a set of political compromises and perhaps a series of historical compromises that would have to enjoy popular near unanimity at a time when the conflicting parties in Iraq do not seem to be willing to make such compromises.
Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:
- The award-winning Middle East Lobbying - The Influence Game
- Archived articles
- Exclusive events
- The Week in Review
- Lobbying newsletter delivered weekly