One of the most-discussed topics in Western capitals these days is exactly where Turkey stands in relation to the Islamic State (IS), which has terrorized vast swaths of land in Iraq and Syria. Ankara has repeatedly declared that it considers IS a terrorist organization and a threat to Turkey and the whole region, but there are two additional problems it has in mind:
- The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and its Syrian extension, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), have been defending Kobani against IS onslaught. Although many in the West might sympathize with these Kurdish militants who are heroically fighting the brutal jihadists, they still fall into the category of “terrorists” in Turkish eyes, despite the ongoing “peace process” between the Turkish government and the PKK. (In fact, precisely because of this Turkish hesitancy to help Kobani, the same peace process has become very fragile, as demonstrated by the recent Kurdish riots across Turkey that caused some 23 deaths.)
- The Bashar al-Assad regime is another problem for Turkey, as Ankara still considers it the mother of all evils in Syria. An unnamed Turkish Foreign Ministry official expressed this view very clearly to the Turkish press: “For us to be in the international coalition [against IS], we should know the game plan and its end. And the end goal for us is the departure of Assad. … For us, IS is a symptom, whereas the root of the problem is Assad.” Clear enough. But is this really an accurate analysis of the trouble with IS?
