IPI to Release Reporters Guide For Palestine-Israel Conflict

The International Press Institute is set to publish a guide for reporters on the use of language in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, aimed at addressing sensitivities on both sides.

al-monitor The International Press Institute's booklet "Use With Care" helps reporters navigate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Above, a press conference in Tel Aviv is seen through a video camera, Sept. 5, 2008. Photo by REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth.
Daoud Kuttab

Daoud Kuttab


Topics covered

terrorism, press, palestinian-israeli peace process, palestinian-israeli conflict, language, journalists

Oct 21, 2013

It has been said that history is written by the victors. If that is the case, then the reporters guide to language use in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon to be released might reflect that there are no winners in this decades-old struggle. IPI will issue a press release on the booklet tomorrow, Oct. 23.

The reporters guide, Use with Care: A Reporter's Glossary of Loaded Language in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, was produced by the Vienna-based International Press Institute (IPI) and is the result of years of back-and-forth drafting by six unnamed Palestinian and Israeli journalists. The guidebook should be found in every newsroom in the world that deals with the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Some 150 terms are represented in the guide. Each term is listed in English, Arabic and Hebrew, along with a phonetic transcription of both the Hebrew and Arabic words in Latin characters. Alongside every term are two or three paragraphs explaning the meaning of the term, how it is used and why one side or the other might find it problematic. Finally, another column suggests alternative terms.

The authors, editors and IPI publishers, however, don’t always suggest alternatives, but sometimes choose to accept a particular term as the most appropriate. "Occupation," "siege," "demonstration," "Nakba," "settlers" and "settlements," for example, are explained and the publishers conclude that they are appropriate descriptions. Similarly, "Zionism" is described and accepted as a proper term. However, "Zionist entity" is not. After explaining that the latter is used as a way to avoid recognizing Israel, the authors suggest the use of the alternative term, Israel. The same is suggested as an alternative for the term “Jewish state,” which the authors say is problematic for Palestinians because it is “ignores and downplays the Arab/Palestinian history and culture of cities and places that predate the existence of the State of Israel. Palestinians also believe the expression indicates that non-Jewish Israelis, such as Palestinian citizens of Israel, are not fully part of society or the state.” Here, again, they suggest using “Israel.”

The guide also recommends that some adjectives used with certain terms be dropped. For example, “innocent civilians” is often used by both sides when referring to a violent act that results in the death of civilians. The publishers suggest simply dropping the adjective.

Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:
  • Al-Monitor Archives
  • The Week in Review
  • Exclusive Events
  • Invitation-only Briefings

More from  Palestine

Palestinians radio silent on Netanyahu’s visit to Saudi Arabia
Ahmad Melhem | Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Dec 1, 2020
Palestinians in quandary about new visitors from Gulf
Daoud Kuttab | Jerusalem | Nov 26, 2020
Hamas seeks to lock in Qatar aid while exchanging border fire with Israel
Ahmad Abu Amer | Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Nov 24, 2020
Pompeo’s visit to Psagot settlement, a farewell gift from Trump to Israel
Ahmad Melhem | Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Nov 21, 2020