Iran Pulse

Iran Pleased With US Pause on Syria Strike

Article Summary
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif had been stressing the need for cooperation and consultation on Syria.

TEHRAN, Iran — The night of Aug. 31, when US President Barack Obama announced that he would consult Congress before any strike on Syria, was a night of jubilation in Tehran. “Nobody wants to go to war,” an Iranian official, who requested not to be identified, told me. He added, “This was one of the first achievements for President Hassan Rouhani’s administration, and it should be a lesson to the Americans that the conflict in Syria needs love, not war.” According to the official, Iran was ready for options, including the military one. He said, “We were ready for all options: A strike on Syria means a strike on Iran, and the allies of Syria had their plans ready for execution. Other options included closing the Strait of Hormuz. Will they bear closing the straight for 24 hours?”

For several days, Iran was busy with the developments in Syria, and officials had one subject to comment and react on. Zarif contacted more than 15 of his counterparts — many of them Europeans — and conveyed a clear message of the serious need to cooperate and coordinate on issues such as Syria, while other officials — mainly military officers — were threatening that the war might burn the whole region and a Syrian response would hit Israel. Similar comments were made by Speaker of Parliament Ali Larijani, who made it clear that the United States can start a war but will not be able to put an end to it. 

The Iranian official told Al-Monitor that this encounter proved once again that Iran is essential for any solution in the region. He said, “This might be a good sign that the Americans need to understand who the real players in the region are. They might have weapons and allies, but this all means nothing if they want to continue dealing with the region as a protectorate.” He added, “After this, I believe the best thing Barack Obama should do is not go to Congress to strike Syria, but rather open a true dialogue and help stop the bloodshed in Syria. We can help with this if the move was truthful.”

On Aug. 28, Al-Monitor’s Seyed Hossein Mousavian suggested that Iran and the United States might be able to manage the Syrian crisis, giving eight reasons. Now that the US strike on Syria has been postponed until Congress votes, it is expected that mediators would start new efforts to ease tensions. A source in Tehran highlighted the role Oman’s sultan is playing. “The sultan wants a solution. It is not only a matter of interests, the man is passionate about it. He played a big role before and now he is starting to exert some efforts,” the source explained to Al-Monitor. He said that Iran prefers to solve the problems one by one, because bringing all the files together will lead nowhere. He said, “We can make a breakthrough in Syria. Why should we link Syria to the nuclear file, to Israel's position? Whenever it starts this way, something can be achieved." Our source continued, “We don’t want war in the region, we want good relations with those on the other side of the Persian Gulf, and we want good relations with Europe and the West. Hence, we can’t sacrifice our rights. Iran is a nation of almost 90 million people, we are thousands of years old. Don’t expect us to bow even if that was the last thing we do.”

On Sept. 9, Congress is to decide on the strike on Syria. Should there be good news on the Iranian-US mediation link, then the strike is likely to be ruled out, which will mean that Geneva II will embrace hopes for the Syrian people. There might be consensus on a new interim government and a road map for the future. On the contrary, if the United States and the Iranians fail to get closer, then there is no need to make any predictions — the region might then be heading toward the unpredictable.

Ali Hashem is an Arab journalist serving as Al Mayadeen news network's chief correspondent. Until March 2012, he was Al Jazeera's war correspondent, and prior to that he was a senior journalist at the BBC. He has written for several Arab newspapers, including the Lebanese daily As Safir, the Egyptian dailies Al-Masry al-Youm and Aldostor, and the Jordanian daily Alghad. He has also contributed to The Guardian. On Twitter: @alihashem_tv

Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:

  • The award-winning Middle East Lobbying - The Influence Game
  • Archived articles
  • Exclusive events
  • The Week in Review
  • Lobbying newsletter delivered weekly
Found in: syria, iran, geneva ii, geneva, congress

Ali Hashem is a journalist following Iranian affairs. He has covered several Iranian, regional and International stories for Al-Mayadeen, Al-Jazeera and the BBC over the past decade. He writes extensively for Al-Monitor about Iranian and regional affairs and his articles have run in The Guardian, the Sunday Times, the Huffington Post, The National and the Japanese magazine Facta. On Twitter: @alihashem_tv

Next for you

The website uses cookies and similar technologies to track browsing behavior for adapting the website to the user, for delivering our services, for market research, and for advertising. Detailed information, including the right to withdraw consent, can be found in our Privacy Policy. To view our Privacy Policy in full, click here. By using our site, you agree to these terms.