The right has recently started using the claim of “Judenrein” (German for “an area cleared of Jews”) to spearhead its propaganda against the two-state solution. How is it possible, they ask, tauntingly, that Israel has a 20% Palestinian minority, and yet the Palestinians are demanding to rid the West Bank of all its Jewish residents, down to the very last one?
Responding to the September 2011 statement by the Palestine Liberation Organization’s ambassador to the United States, Maen Areikat, that Palestine should be devoid of Jews, Elliott Abrams, who was an adviser to former president George Bush, told USA Today, "Such a state would be the first to officially prohibit Jews or any other faith since Nazi Germany." He even defined as “an abhorrent form of anti-Semitism” the position of the Palestinian envoy, who told reporters, “After the experience of the last 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it would be in the best interest of the two people to be separated.”
The public reservations voiced by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas about the idea of absorbing Jewish settlers into a future Arab state of Palestine were met in Jerusalem with stringent Zionist criticism. This criticism appears to have softened Abbas’ unequivocal opposition to the absorption of a Jewish minority in his state. In response to a question from an Israeli reporter who accompanied representatives of the Meretz Party on an Aug. 22 visit to the Palestinian headquarters in Ramallah as to whether he would be willing for some of the settlements to remain in place under Palestinian sovereignty after an agreement is signed with Israel, Abbas said, “These are details that must be discussed” and promised, “The issue will be placed on the negotiating table and we’ll address it with an open mind.”
Had I been in his shoes, I would have added, "If Israel insists we leave the settlements in our country, our parliament will translate into Arabic all of your laws designed to safeguard Israel’s Jewish majority and Jewish identity. In addition, I promise the settlers similar treatment to that which you Israelis grant the non-Jewish minority living under your sovereignty."
Here is how the 1950 Law of Return — one of the central pieces of legislation on Israel’s statute book — and its 1970 amendment would be adapted for the Palestinian statutes: “An immigration certificate will be granted to any Palestinian who expresses a desire to settle in Palestine (except if the minister of immigration deems the petitioner is acting against the Palestinian people or could endanger public health or the security of the state), a Palestinian who comes to Palestine and after his arrival expresses a desire to settle there and any Palestinian who immigrated to Palestine before the law went into effect and any Palestinian born in the country. Immigrant rights will also be granted to the children and grandchildren of the Palestinian, to the partner of the Palestinian and to the partner of the children and grandchildren of the Palestinian …”
In addition, the Palestinian parliament can copy and adapt Israel’s 2002 Citizenship Law and decree that if the partner of a Jewish resident of Palestine is a Jewish resident of Israel, he or she will not be eligible for residency or citizenship in Palestine. Palestine will also adopt the concept of the Nakba Law and will impose sanctions on Jewish settlements celebrating Israel’s day of independence or mourning the peace agreement that ended the era of Israeli occupation.
According to an analysis conducted by Adalah (the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel), these are just some of the 55 Israeli laws that discriminate against the state’s Palestinian citizens, whether directly or indirectly. And Israel’s Knesset members are not done yet in this regard.
It’s ludicrous to draw parallels between the Palestinian minority in Israel and a Jewish minority in Palestine. A pattern of discrimination has become entrenched in Israel since its founding in 1948, including the expropriation of lands owned by Arab citizens for Jewish settlement. In its 65 years of existence, the state of Israel has established some 600 local Jewish councils and municipalities, and not a single Arab village, town or city.
There is a chronic shortage of clinics and hospitals, schools and kindergartens in Arab towns and villages. Official data published in 2004 indicate that school budgets allocated to Jewish children are three times those allocated to Arab ones. The compulsory education bill stresses Jewish history and culture. The state allocates resources to its Jewish citizens as a privileged majority by creating “areas of national preference” and using military service as a criterion for resource allocation.
The policy of discrimination, designed to ensure a Jewish majority, is especially evident in Jerusalem, where Palestinian residents were annexed by Israel, which takes pride in the city’s “unification” under a single flag. Here is a sampling of data compiled by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel on the occasion of the last annual “Jerusalem Day”:
There are 371,844 Palestinians living in Jerusalem, constituting 39% of the city’s population. Of this, 79.5% subsist below the poverty line (85% of them children), and 25 “infant wellness” clinics function in Jewish west Jerusalem and only four in the east. Some 80%-85% of the adults and 90% of the minors who require mental healthcare do not receive it. Three welfare offices in the east handle about a third of the city’s population, compared with 18 in the west. A social worker in east Jerusalem has double the case load of a social worker in the western part of the city. Only 46% of Palestinian children attend official city schools because of an ongoing shortage of over 1,000 classrooms in the municipal school system, and some 40% of 12th graders drop out of school.
The discrimination against Jerusalem’s Palestinian residents is especially conspicuous in real-estate policy. One third of the lands of Jerusalem Palestinians have been confiscated since 1967 to build tens of thousands of housing units for the Jewish population. Only 13% of the housing units approved for construction in the city between 2005 and 2009 were in Palestinian neighborhoods. The zoning plans for Palestinian neighborhoods do not include most of the land under Palestinian ownership. The areas zoned for Palestinian housing construction constitute only 14% of the area of east Jerusalem. The maximum construction area permitted in Palestinian neighborhoods is 25-50% of each plot, whereas construction in Jewish neighborhoods is allowed on 75%-125% of each plot’s square area. Between 1967 and 2012, Israel revoked the residence status of 14,263 Palestinians from east Jerusalem due to their “extended absence from the city.”
On second thought, if I were Abbas, I would be announcing today that Palestine will welcome its Jewish residents with open arms, a willing heart and equal rights. This, on the condition that the state of Israel welcomes with open arms, a willing heart and equal rights its Palestinian residents.
Anyone have a problem with that?
Akiva Eldar is a contributing writer for Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. He was formerly a senior columnist and editorial writer for Haaretz and also served as the Hebrew daily’s US bureau chief and diplomatic correspondent. His most recent book (with Idith Zertal), Lords of the Land, on the Jewish settlements, was on the best-seller list in Israel and has been translated into English, French, German and Arabic.
Continue reading this article by registering at no cost and get unlimited access to:
- The award-winning Middle East Lobbying - The Influence Game
- Archived articles
- Exclusive events
- The Week in Review
- Lobbying newsletter delivered weekly