Skip to main content

Eight Questions on 'Purging' Of Egypt's Judiciary

Bassem Sabry discusses the recent controversy surrounding the judiciary in Egypt and debates the Muslim Brotherhood's motives.
Egypt's President Mohamed Mursi (L) shakes hand with Egypt's Justice Minister Ahmed Mekky during the visit of Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Raheem al-Keeb, who is leading a Libyan delegation of government ministers, at the presidential palace in Cairo, August 6, 2012. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh  (EGYPT - Tags: POLITICS) - RTR36A2J

A popular narrative asserts that in 1969, still feeling the sting of the 1967 defeat, Gamal Abdel Nasser sought to impose tighter control over the state, including the ushering in of a more politically aligned and allied judiciary. Much of the judiciary defied his wish, preferring instead that judges stay out of politics and out of the Socialist Arab Union, the one and only political party at the time. Nasser, under the influence of his security apparatus and loyalists in the judiciary, allegedly would not have it.

Reports by Nasser's infamous "vanguard organization," a secret association of regime-sympathizing cadres belonging to the Socialist Arab Union, is said to have suggested to the president that a significant portion of the judicial leadership hailed from the days of the monarchy and held values different from the ideology of the “revolution.” The reports further suggested that there were alternatively many in the judiciary who supported Nasser's vision of it. Those who opposed that vision, on the other hand, were instruments of the “counter-revolution.”

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.