Skip to main content

Momentum ShiftsAgainst Iran War

US President Obama has chosen to abandon out-hawking the hawks to outsmarting them, says Trita Parsi for al-Monitor. The Obama administration draws the line at nuclear weapons production rather than enrichment, a clearer, more enforceable definition that has the force of international law behind it — and avoids the need for military action in the near future.
U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks to AIPAC's annual policy conference in Washington, March 4, 2012. Obama's remarks to the influential pro-Israel lobby kick off an important week in the U.S.-Israel relationship as Obama will meet Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid heightened concern that Israel might attack Iran to thwart its nuclear program.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS)

US President Barack Obama did what few people expected him to do at the recent conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a hawkish pro-Israel group. He chose that moment to shift his strategy from out-hawking the hawks (which is next to impossible) to outsmarting them.

He refused to yield to the pressure of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and AIPAC on the Iranian nuclear issue. Israel, like the US during the George W. Bush administration, considers a nuclear capability in Iran to be a “red line.” Israel argues that the only acceptable guarantee that Iran will not get a nuclear weapon is for Iran to have no uranium enrichment program.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.