Skip to main content

Netanyahu’s dilemma: settlements versus immunity

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must deal with the problematic demand that he include reversing disengagement from the northern West Bank as part of a coalition agreement.
An Israeli settler walks between concrete walls for protection at the Jewish West Bank settlement of Ganim.   An Israeli settler walks between concrete walls for protection at the Jewish West Bank settlement of Ganim, May 24, 2005. Ganim and another three Jewish settlements, Kadim, Homesh and Sa-Nur, at the northern part of the West Bank are about to be removed as part of Israel's disengagement plan in Gaza and north Samaria. Photo taken May 24, 2005. REUTERS/Nir Elias - RP6DRNASSZAC
Read in 

After the Donald Trump administration decided to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights in March, the possibility of annexing Israeli settlements in the West Bank began making headlines. On April 6, three days before Israel held elections, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced, “We will move to the next stage — to the gradual extension of Israeli sovereignty in the areas of Judea and Samaria [West Bank],” and explained that he meant all the settlements, not just the large settlement blocs. The day before the balloting, Netanyahu honed his message, stating that he had already engaged the Americans in discussions on obtaining their consent to annex the settlements.

On April 10 in Al-Monitor, Shlomi Eldar asserted that Netanyahu’s fifth government would be a government of annexation. He went on to link the annexation of certain territories in the West Bank to the various right-wing parties granting Netanyahu immunity from indictment. That is exactly what is happening.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.