Skip to main content

Divided Republicans struggle to formulate post-Iran deal policy

While some GOP leaders cautioned President Donald Trump against withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, others praised the move and pushed for new sanctions — and even a war authorization.

U.S. Representative Michael McCaul (R-TX) arrives at Trump Tower to meet with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump in New York, U.S., November 29, 2016.   REUTERS/Mike Segar - RC17792FFC10
US Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, arrives at Trump Tower to meet with Donald Trump in New York three weeks after Trump was elected president, Nov. 29, 2016. — REUTERS/Mike Segar

President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal after minimal consultation with lawmakers has made it difficult for his own party to coalesce around a legislative strategy moving forward.

Some high-profile House Republicans made clear today that they think the White House has left the United States isolated by unilaterally withdrawing from the agreement. Others took a more hawkish line advocating for new sanctions — and even a new war authorization to counter Iran and its proxies throughout the Middle East.

“We’re seeing a new enemy that’s more [Shiite]-based than Sunni,” said House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, who called on Congress to pass an authorization for the use of military force against Iran and its Shiite proxy forces throughout the region.

“It’s not al-Qaeda or [the Islamic State] now,” McCaul told Al-Monitor. “It’s a … threat from Iran and they’ve extended into Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen. So that’s just one of the options or tools that Congress may have.”

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish