Skip to main content

Obama's Unnecessary Red Line

President Obama's hesitation in enforcing his own red line on Syria will make Israelis question his limits for Iran.
U.S. President Barack Obama makes remarks on the situation in Syria, at the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington August 31, 2013. Obama said on Saturday he had decided the United States should strike Syrian government targets in response to a deadly chemical weapons attack, but said he would seek a congressional vote for any military action.   REUTERS/Mike Theiler (UNITED STATES - Tags: CIVIL UNREST POLITICS HEADSHOT) - RTX1330F
Read in 

President Barack Obama learned the hard way that drawing lines isn’t a game. Had he not announced on Aug. 20 of last year that the use of weapons of mass destruction by the Syrian regime would constitute the crossing of a red line, the US president would not be now forced to choose between the loss of US credibility and the erosion of his personal prestige, and an additional military entanglement in the Middle East and a crisis in relations with Russia.

True, setting a red line promises a fat front-page headline next to a flattering photo of a courageous leader. On the other hand, the speaker must take into account that red lines are seared deeply into our collective conscious and enjoy a long life span. One can assume that we will not hear Obama talking again about red lines in the near future.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.