Skip to main content

Emirati Sent to Jail Over 'False Tweets'

UAE media law allows wide latitude for crackdown on critical reporting.

People stand outside the federal supreme court, where the verdict for five political activists was read out, in Abu Dhabi November 27, 2011. The activists convicted on Sunday of insulting the leaders of the United Arab Emirates were sentenced to between two and three years in jail. REUTERS/Nikhil Monteiro (UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - Tags: CRIME LAW POLITICS CIVIL UNREST) - RTR2UJ0C
People stand outside the federal supreme court, where the verdict for five political activists was read out, in Abu Dhabi Nov. 27, 2011. — REUTERS/Nikhil Monteiro

An Emirati accused of spreading "false news" about the sedition trial in the United Arab Emirates lost his appeal on May 22 and will head to prison for 10 months.

An analysis of Abdullah Al Haddidi’s offending tweets shows he was engaged in criticism of the trial and providing information about the case to his followers.

Al Haddidi was charged with Article 265 of the Penal Code, which makes it a crime to describe a court hearing without “honesty and in bad faith.” In essence, the law makes it a crime to disseminate false news — and the police and courts decide what communication is truthful.

In countries with robust protections for a free press, laws against “false news” have been ruled incompatible with free expression. The truth, after all, can be subjective, and such laws have been used to suppress speech that governments find embarrassing or inconvenient.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish