Skip to main content

Blasphemy in Turkey — And the Fazil Say Affair

Mustafa Akyol argues that Fazil Say should not be convicted either of blasphemy or hate speech, although Say is guilty of insulting and denigrating pious Muslims.

A photo taken on February 9, 2010 shows Turkish pianist and composer Fazil Say posing at the Theatre des Champs-Elysees in Paris. Fazil Say,charged with attacks on religious values for a series of provocative tweets about Islam, will go on trial from October 17, 2012.  Under Turkish law, anyone convicted of insulting religious values can be sentenced to between three months and one year in prison.   AFP PHOTO / FRED DUFOUR        (Photo credit should read FRED DUFOUR/AFP/GettyImages)
Turkish pianist and composer Fazil Say, seen at the Theatre des Champs-Elysees in Paris on Feb. 9, 2010, was given an 18-month suspended sentence for statements made on Twitter.

Global news agencies reported last week [April 15] that Turkish courts punished an artist for the crime of blasphemy. World-renowned Turkist pianist Fazil Say, 44, was given an 18-month prison sentence, which was automatically suspended, for statements made on Twitter. A headline in The Guardian gave a typical interpretation: “Turkish composer and pianist convicted of blasphemy on Twitter.”

But was Fazil Say really convicted of blasphemy?

Dictionary.com defines this term as "impious utterance or action concerning God or sacred things.” Wikipedia agrees, by noting, “Blasphemy is the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for a religious deity.”

In other words, a “blasphemy law," by definition, is a law that presupposes God, and aims at protecting him from irreverence.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish