Skip to main content

Transitional Justice in Iraq Is Anything But

Transitional justice in Iraq has been a front for political score-settling and vengeance and that must change, writes Mushreq Abbas.
A suspected al-Qaeda militant is taken away by Iraqi police after a presentation to the media at the Interior Ministry in Baghdad November 21, 2011. A total of 22 suspected militants were presented to the media on Monday as they await their trial, according to the police. REUTERS/Saad Shalash (IRAQ - Tags: POLITICS CIVIL UNREST CRIME LAW)
Read in 

In Iraq, the concept of “transitional justice” was always defined as a tool to settle pre-2003 scores. The Iraqi government’s decision to terminate the Criminal Court, which specialized in trying members of the former regime, may have been an indication that this transitional justice phase had run its course, and of a shift towards a “state of law.” In fact, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki made the latter term the title of his electoral bloc so as to indicate this shift.

But the reality on the ground differs, not only in regards to the purging of former regime members, but in regards to the need for transitional justice in order to counteract the legacy of violence and political, social and institutional turmoil that followed in the regime’s wake.

Access the Middle East news and analysis you can trust

Join our community of Middle East readers to experience all of Al-Monitor, including 24/7 news, analyses, memos, reports and newsletters.

Subscribe

Only $100 per year.